Every Monday morning, Spotify gifts its users a fresh Discover Weekly playlist, promising new music tailored precisely to our tastes. It feels intimate, almost magical—like Spotify knows us. After all, the playlist has our favorite genres, familiar artists, and songs that sound just close enough to what we already love. But that’s precisely the problem.
What Discover Weekly offers is not discovery so much as repetition disguised as novelty. And long before algorithms existed, Theodor Adorno warned us this would happen.
Adorno argued that popular music is built on standardization: songs follow predictable structures, harmonic progressions, rhythms, and emotional arcs. What changes are surface-level details—different voices, slightly altered melodies, new production effects. These minor differences create the illusion of individuality while the underlying framework remains the same. Spotify’s algorithm thrives on this exact logic.
Discover Weekly does not challenge listeners; it comforts them. The algorithm learns what you already like and feeds you more songs that fit neatly into those same sonic patterns. The playlist may introduce “new” artists, but they sound uncannily familiar. As Adorno would put it, the music has already been “pre-digested.” The listening is done for us.
Spotify frames this experience as personalization—your unique taste, your curated playlist. But Adorno would call this pseudo-individualization: the illusion of choice within a system that limits what options are actually available. You feel like an active participant when in reality you’re moving within tightly controlled boundaries. You can skip a song, save a track, or ignore the playlist altogether—but everything offered still conforms to the same musical logic.
This system also shapes how we listen. Discover Weekly is designed for passive consumption: background music for work, driving, or scrolling. Like Adorno’s description of popular music as a form of leisure-time distraction, the playlist fills silence without demanding attention. It keeps us entertained while ensuring we don’t listen too closely—or think too critically—about what we’re hearing.
What’s most striking is how Discover Weekly redefines “discovery.” True discovery involves risk: encountering sounds that feel unfamiliar, uncomfortable, or even boring at first. Spotify’s algorithm avoids this entirely. Songs that deviate too far from your established preferences are filtered out, reinforcing what Adorno feared most—a culture that discourages difference while pretending to celebrate it.
In this way, Discover Weekly doesn’t just reflect our tastes; it trains them. The more we listen, the narrower the algorithm’s understanding of what we want becomes. We are rewarded for sameness and gently steered away from anything that might disrupt the flow.
Adorno believed popular music functioned as a kind of social glue, keeping listeners content within existing systems rather than pushing them to question them. Spotify’s Discover Weekly does the same—only now the culture industry doesn’t need record executives or radio programmers. The algorithm handles it quietly, efficiently, and with a friendly green interface.
So the next time Spotify tells you it’s found the perfect song for you, it might be worth asking: is this discovery—or just another echo?
This really made me think differently about Discover Weekly. I’ve always treated it like a fun way to find “new” music, but you’re right—it usually just sounds like slightly different versions of what I already like. The idea that discovery requires risk really stuck with me, because algorithms seem designed to avoid that completely. Now I’m wondering if real discovery means going outside the algorithm on purpose. Great connection to Adorno—it feels way more relevant than I expected.
ReplyDelete