Have you ever listened to a remix where two completely different songs somehow come together into one perfect mix? Music like this can be creative and exciting, but is it truly a form of art and skill, or is it simply copying someone else’s work? In the documentary RiP!: A Remix Manifesto, filmmaker Brett Gaylor explores this debate through the work of mash up artist Girl Talk. Girl Talk creates songs almost entirely from samples of other artists’ music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39y-BGoJTms
The tracks are very lively and creative causing them to have a solid fan base. The fast beats and layered samples create what our reading would call "intensity patterns". Music that feels exciting, but what makes it interesting is not just the sound. Girl Talk’s music suggests that culture always builds on the past. By blending old songs into new ones, he creates an “illusion of life” that reflects today’s media world that is fast and connected. 
However, copyright law says he is technically breaking the rules because he does not always ask permission to use those samples. From one side, remixing without permission looks like stealing. From the other side, it looks like creativity and free expression. This connects to what we learned about standardization. Music corporations protect their songs the way factories protect products. So what is the real issue, maybe it is not just about music. If culture always builds on the past, should anyone truly own an idea forever? 
No comments:
Post a Comment